Country Trends

Curious about the Footprints of individual countries?

Select Country AfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAngolaArgentinaArmeniaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBrazilBritish Virgin IslandsBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaColombiaComorosCongoCongo DRCosta RicaCote d’IvoireCroatiaCubaCyprusCzech RepublicCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFijiFinlandFranceFrench PolynesiaGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuadeloupeGuatemalaGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIran, Islamic Republic ofIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKorea, DPRKorea, Republic ofKyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLithuaniaLuxembourgMacedonia TFYRMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaliMartiniqueMasterMauritania MauritiusMexicoMoldovaMongoliaMontenegroMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNepalNetherlandsNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNorwayOmanPakistanPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussian FederationRwandaSaint LuciaSamoaSao Tome and PrincipeSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSomaliaSouth AfricaSpainSriLankaSwedenSwitzerlandSyrian Arab RepublicTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimorLesteTogoTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanUgandaUkraineUnited KingdomUnited States of AmericaUruguayUzbekistanVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet NamWallis and Futuna IslandsWorldYemenZambiaZimbabwe

Bermuda

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Bermuda since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Bermuda in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

British Virgin Islands

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in British Virgin Islands since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for British Virgin Islands in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Russian Federation

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Russian Federation since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Russian Federation in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

World

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in World since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for World in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Wallis and Futuna Islands

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Wallis and Futuna Islands since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Wallis and Futuna Islands in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Tonga

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Tonga since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Tonga in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Sao Tome and Principe

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Sao Tome and Principe since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Sao Tome and Principe in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Samoa

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Samoa since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Samoa in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Saint Lucia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Saint Lucia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Saint Lucia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Montenegro

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Montenegro since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Montenegro in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Martinique

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Martinique since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Martinique in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Guyana

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Guyana since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Guyana in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Guadeloupe

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Guadeloupe since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Guadeloupe in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Luxembourg

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Luxembourg since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Luxembourg in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Grenada

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Grenada since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Grenada in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

French Polynesia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in French Polynesia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for French Polynesia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Fiji

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Fiji since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Fiji in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Cyprus

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Cyprus since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Cyprus in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Cape Verde

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Cape Verde since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Cape Verde in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Bhutan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Bhutan since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Bhutan in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Barbados

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Barbados since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Barbados in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Dominica

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Dominica since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Dominica in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Czechoslovakia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Czechoslovakia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Czechoslovakia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Côte d’Ivoire

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Côte d’Ivoire since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Côte d’Ivoire in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Comoros

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Comoros since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Comoros in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Zimbabwe

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Zimbabwe since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Zimbabwe in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Zambia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Zambia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Zambia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Yemen

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Yemen since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Yemen in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Viet Nam

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Viet Nam since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Viet Nam in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Uzbekistan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Uzbekistan since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Uzbekistan in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Uruguay

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Uruguay since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Uruguay in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

United States of America

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in United States of America since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for United States of America in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

United Kingdom

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in United Kingdom since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for United Kingdom in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Ukraine

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Ukraine since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Ukraine in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Turkmenistan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Turkmenistan since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Turkmenistan in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Turkey

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Turkey since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Turkey in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Tunisia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Tunisia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Tunisia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Uganda

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Uganda since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Uganda in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Togo

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Togo since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Togo in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Trinidad and Tobago

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Trinidad and Tobago since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Trinidad and Tobago in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

TimorLeste

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in TimorLeste since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for TimorLeste in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Thailand

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Thailand since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Thailand in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Tanzania

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Tanzania since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Tanzania in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Tajikistan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Tajikistan since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Tajikistan in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Syrian Arab Republic

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Syrian Arab Republic since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Syrian Arab Republic in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Switzerland

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Switzerland since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Switzerland in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Sweden

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Sweden since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Sweden in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

SriLanka

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in SriLanka since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for SriLanka in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Spain

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Spain since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Spain in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

South Africa

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in South Africa since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for South Africa in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Somalia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Somalia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Somalia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Slovenia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Slovenia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Slovenia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Slovakia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Slovakia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Slovakia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Singapore

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Singapore since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Singapore in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Sierra Leone

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Sierra Leone since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Sierra Leone in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Serbia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Serbia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Serbia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Senegal

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Senegal since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Senegal in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Rwanda

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Rwanda since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Rwanda in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Romania

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Romania since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Romania in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Portugal

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Portugal since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Portugal in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Poland

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Poland since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Poland in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Philippines

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Philippines since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Philippines in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Peru

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Peru since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Peru in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Paraguay

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Paraguay since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Paraguay in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Papua New Guinea

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Papua New Guinea since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Papua New Guinea in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Panama

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Panama since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Panama in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Pakistan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Pakistan since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Pakistan in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Oman

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Oman since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Oman in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Norway

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Norway since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Norway in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Nigeria

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Nigeria since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Nigeria in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Niger

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Niger since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Niger in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Nicaragua

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Nicaragua since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Nicaragua in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

New Zealand

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in New Zealand since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for New Zealand in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Netherlands

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Netherlands since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Netherlands in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Nepal

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Nepal since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Nepal in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Myanmar

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Myanmar since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Myanmar in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Mozambique

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mozambique since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mozambique in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Morocco

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Morocco since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Morocco in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Mongolia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mongolia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mongolia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Moldova

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Moldova since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Moldova in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Mexico

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mexico since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mexico in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Mauritius

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mauritius since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mauritius in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Mauritania

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mauritania since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mauritania in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Master

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Master since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Master in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Mali

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mali since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mali in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Malawi

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Malawi since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Malawi in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Madagascar

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Madagascar since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Madagascar in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Macedonia TFYR

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Macedonia TFYR since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Macedonia TFYR in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Malaysia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Malaysia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Malaysia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Lithuania

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Lithuania since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Lithuania in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Libyan Arab Jamahiriya since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Libyan Arab Jamahiriya in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Liberia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Liberia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Liberia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Lesotho

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Lesotho since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Lesotho in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Lebanon

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Lebanon since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Lebanon in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Latvia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Latvia since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Latvia in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Lao People's Democratic Republic

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Lao People's Democratic Republic since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Lao People's Democratic Republic in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Korea, Republic of

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Korea, Republic of since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Korea, Republic of in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Kyrgyzstan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Kyrgyzstan since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Kyrgyzstan in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

Korea, DPR

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Korea, DPR since 1961. Both are measured in global hectares. Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, weather, and population size. Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency. While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies. The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Korea, DPR in the lower-right corner of the graph.

Download the PUBLIC DATA PACKAGE to compare latest results for all countries.

• Get The Newsletter
• Donate Now

© 2003-2016 Global Footprint Network

Last updated on: 03/12/2015