Country Trends

Curious about the Footprints of individual countries?

Select Country The World AfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAngolaArgentinaArmeniaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBeninBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBrazilBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaColombiaCongoCongo DRCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzech RepublicDenmarkDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFinlandFranceGabonGambiaGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuineaGuinea-BissauHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKorea, DPRKorea, RepublicKuwaitKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLithuaniaMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaliMauritaniaMauritiusMexicoMoldovaMongoliaMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNetherlandsNew ZealandNicaraguaNigeriaNorwayOmanPakistanPalestinian Territory PanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalQatarRomaniaRussian FederationRwandaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSomaliaSouth AfricaSpainSriLankaSudanSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimorLesteTogoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaViet NamYemenZambiaZimbabwe

Zimbabwe

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Zimbabwe since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Zambia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Zambia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Yemen

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Yemen since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Viet Nam

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Viet Nam since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Venezuela

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Venezuela since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Uzbekistan

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Uzbekistan since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Uruguay

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Uruguay since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

United States

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in United States since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

United Kingdom

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in United Kingdom since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

United Arab Emirates

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in United Arab Emirates since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Ukraine

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Ukraine since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Turkmenistan

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Turkmenistan since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Turkey

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Turkey since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Tunisia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Tunisia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Uganda

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Uganda since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Togo

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Togo since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

TimorLeste

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in TimorLeste since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Tanzania

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Tanzania since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Tajikistan

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Tajikistan since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Syria

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Syria since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Switzerland

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Switzerland since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Thailand

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Thailand since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Sudan

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Sudan since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Swaziland

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Swaziland since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

SriLanka

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in SriLanka since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Sweden

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Sweden since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

South Africa

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in South Africa since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Somalia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Somalia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Slovenia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Slovenia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Spain

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Spain since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Slovakia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Slovakia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Singapore

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Singapore since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Sierra Leone

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Sierra Leone since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Serbia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Serbia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Senegal

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Senegal since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Saudi Arabia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Saudi Arabia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Rwanda

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Rwanda since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Russian Federation

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Russian Federation since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Romania

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Romania since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Qatar

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Qatar since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Portugal

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Portugal since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Poland

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Poland since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Philippines

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Philippines since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Peru

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Peru since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Papua New Guinea

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Papua New Guinea since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Panama

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Panama since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Paraguay

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Paraguay since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Palestinian Territory

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Palestinian Territory since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Pakistan

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Pakistan since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Oman

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Oman since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Norway

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Norway since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Nigeria

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Nigeria since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Nicaragua

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Nicaragua since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

New Zealand

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in New Zealand since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Netherlands

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Netherlands since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Namibia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Namibia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Myanmar

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Myanmar since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Mozambique

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Mozambique since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Morocco

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Morocco since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Mongolia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Mongolia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Moldova

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Moldova since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Mexico

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Mexico since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Mauritius

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Mauritius since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Mauritania

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Mauritania since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Mali

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Mali since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Malawi

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Malawi since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Madagascar

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Madagascar since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Macedonia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Macedonia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Malaysia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Malaysia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Libya

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Libya since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Liberia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Liberia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Lesotho

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Lesotho since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Lithuania

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Lithuania since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Lebanon

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Lebanon since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Latvia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Latvia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Laos

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Laos since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Kyrgyzstan

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Kyrgyzstan since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Kuwait

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Kuwait since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Korea, Republic

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Korea, Republic since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Korea, Democratic People's Republic

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Korea, Democratic People's Republic since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Kazakhstan

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Kazakhstan since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Jordan

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Jordan since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Japan

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Japan since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Jamaica

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Jamaica since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Kenya

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Kenya since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Italy

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Italy since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Israel

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Israel since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Ireland

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Ireland since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Iraq

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Iraq since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Iran

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Iran since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Indonesia

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Indonesia since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

India

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in India since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Hungary

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Hungary since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Honduras

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Honduras since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Haiti

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Haiti since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Guinea-Bissau

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Guinea-Bissau since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Guatemala

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Guatemala since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Greece

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Greece since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Ghana

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Ghana since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

Germany

Figure 1 tracks the per-person resource demand (Ecological Footprint) and resource supply (Biocapacity) in Germany since 1961. Biocapacity varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather.

Country Factsheets have been produced for each country reported in the Living Planet Report 2012 (16 MB). These compare the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity trends in the most recent LPR (2012) with the previous edition (LPR 2010). There are some differences due to changes in data, methodology and calculations; the full explanation of these can be found here-- each Country Factsheet refers to this document for a more detailed explanation.

• Receive Our Newsletter
• Donate Now

© 2003-2012 Global Footprint Network

Last updated on: 05/08/2012